翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Hartmut Nassauer ・ Hartmut Neugebauer ・ Hartmut Neven ・ Hartmut Nickel ・ Hartmut Ostrowski ・ Hartmut Pilch ・ Hartmut Piniek ・ Hartmut Reck ・ Hartley T. Ferrar ・ Hartley Teakle ・ Hartley Township ・ Hartley Township, O'Brien County, Iowa ・ Hartley Township, Union County, Pennsylvania ・ Hartley transform ・ Hartley TS16/18/21 ・ Hartley v Ponsonby ・ Hartley Vale, New South Wales ・ Hartley Wespall ・ Hartley Williams ・ Hartley Wintney ・ Hartley Wintney F.C. ・ Hartley Wood and Co ・ Hartley's ・ Hartley's Additional Continental Regiment ・ Hartley's test ・ Hartley, California ・ Hartley, Cranbrook ・ Hartley, Cumbria ・ Hartley, Iowa ・ Hartley, Kent Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Hartley v Ponsonby ： ウィキペディア英語版 Hartley v Ponsonby ''Hartley v Ponsonby'' () 26 LJ QB 322 is a leading judgment on the subject of consideration in English contract law. The judgment constituted an amendment to the precedent set by ''Stilk v Myrick''〔() EWHC KB J58〕 that allowed contractual duties to be considered valid consideration for a future contract if the duties had changed to the extent that the original contract is considered discharged. ==Facts== Hartley was contracted to crew a ship owned by Ponsonby. After docking, seventeen of the thirty-six man crew deserted, and only six of the remaining men were competent seamen.〔McKendrick (2007) 97〕 With so many crew members missing it was unsafe for the remaining crew to continue the voyage, but they agreed to do so after being promised extra pay once the ship docked. When the ship arrived at the home port, Ponsonby refused to pay the crewmen the extra wages he had promised.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hartley v Ponsonby」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.